More than 75% of labels made at least one health claim. While there is FDA-approved language for two different “qualified health claims” for fish oil, this language was rarely used. Rather, most labels made vaguer claims considered “structure and function claims” such as “promotes heart health” or “supports brain function.” Cardiovascular health-related claims were the most common, present in 62% of labels, though a range of other health claims were also made, including brain health, joint and musculoskeletal benefits, and other areas such as “immune support.”
Regarding dosing, substantial variability was seen both between and within manufacturers in the total and relative amounts of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). However, only 7.1% of supplements contained ≥ 2 gm of EPA+DHA, the minimum recommended dose for triglyceride lowering, and none contained an EPA dose shown to prevent cardiovascular events (≥ 4 gm/day).
We believe that doctors need to know that most available fish oil supplements do not contain sufficient EPA and DHA to lower triglycerides, and consumers need to be aware that many of the statements made on these labels that imply a health benefit are not supported by any data.