It is not uncommon for practitioners to care for patients on exogenous hormones, from hormone replacement therapy post menopause, during assisted reproductive technology, or as part of gender-affirming care. At the recent #AHA23, we reviewed data on the associations between hormone therapy and cardiovascular disease – and concluded that far more is unknown than known.
The session started with a review on the known associations between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Due to the hemodynamic and hemostatic changes of ART, practitioners must keep in mind acute complications such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), thromboembolism, and bleeding when counseling their patients with CVD or cardiovascular risk factors who are contemplating ART. ART has been associated with an elevated risk of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, which includes preeclampsia, and thromboembolism. Currently, there are no data confirming an elevated risk of future cardiovascular disease after ART, though studies are lacking.
The session then pivoted to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and what to do after a patient on HRT has a myocardial infarction. Multiple studies have looked at the relationship between HRT and cardiovascular disease with mixed results, likely due to differences in study population, timing of HRT initiation, and formulation of HRT used, among other factors. However, when taking the sum of available data, none suggest benefit of HRT for the primary or secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, a finding reiterated in the 2011 update to the Guidelines for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women. It is important to acknowledge that data in this field are from older studies conducted at a time when primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD and the epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors were different. Thus, it may be time for updated data in a more contemporary cohort.